Comparative Analysis: FY 2025-26 vs. FY 2024-25
(Data Period: April - January)
Corporate Strategy & Business Intelligence
February 2026
Key Performance Indicators & Growth Trajectory
Direct entity comparison across critical business parameters
| Performance Metric | UPCL (FY 25-26) | UPML (FY 25-26) | Combined YoY Δ | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production Volume (MT) | 452,000 | 318,500 | +18.2% | UPCL capacity expansion driving growth |
| OpEx per Unit | ₹42.50 | ₹48.20 | -4.5% | Better cost optimization in UPCL plants |
| Revenue Contribution | 58% | 42% | -- | UPML narrowing the gap via high-value niche |
| Maintenance Downtime | 4.2 Days | 6.1 Days | +0.8 Days | UPML aging infrastructure needs overhaul |
| Safety Index Score | 9.8/10 | 9.6/10 | +0.2 | Exceptional safety standards maintained |
Dominates high-volume market segments. Production efficiency reached record highs in Q3 FY 25-26. Digital transformation of supply chain nearly complete.
Transitioning towards premium value-added products. EBITDA margins improved despite lower volumes compared to UPCL. R&D focus increasing.
Regional penetration and industry-wide benchmark analysis
Infrastructure Update: Accelerate UPML plant modernization to reduce maintenance downtime by 20% in the coming fiscal year.
Market Expansion: Investigate East Zone low penetration; potential for 15% growth through targeted distribution networks.
Cost Leadership: Leverage UPCL's digital supply chain model to optimize UPML logistics, targeting 3% OpEx reduction.
Sustainability: Implement Green Energy initiatives across both entities to meet upcoming ESG regulatory benchmarks.